Texas Child Preditor Service (CPS)

(Justice still eludes us as of 5/31/08. No matter what the Court of Appeals orders, and no matter what the Texas Supreme Court orders... and even with the severely chastened CPS concurrance, Ober Judge Walther is still hell bent on proving she is supreme and every one should kow tow to her. See the end of the page for latest info.)

The CPS is a Texas State Agency dedicated to separating parents and children in a tragic parody of justice and fair play. Its first measure of success is when it gains absolute control over children and separates them from their parents. A CPS agent who does not get control of children is viewed as ineffective by their peers and the CPS agency. They may respond "Of course, that is our job." The point is, That is their job. If you don't do your job, you don't get rewarded.

The Texas CPS masquerades behind the unassailable desirability of protecting children, yet runs rough shod over the rights of parents and children, with the complicity of the Judicial System of the State of Texas.

Child safety, even more than other "safety" issues, is sacrosanct in the minds of the public, governmental agencies, and the courts. No judge wants to take a position that would result in that judge being blamed for disregarding "child safety". So, when the CPS claims an issue even of potential or future child safety no matter how tenuous or remote, no matter how far in the very distant future, every court accedes to CPS taking 1 to more than 400 children at a time from their homes, parents and lives, with no proof other than one sided testimony from paid agency employees, who gain in employment stature and promotion by testifying in favor of the CPS agency.

Failure to gain custody of children does not enhance a career at CPS. Gaining control over children enhances employment stature at CPS
CPS employees, while ostensibly having the interests of children in mind, actually are personal and group beneficiaries of their own testimony in court. They are not unbiased witnesses. They are trained to give simple recitations of scripted testimony, (which is absolutely generalist: "I believe there is possible ..." or even "there is a chance of future danger...". ).

The script recited by these employees results in, every judge, in every hearing, rubber stamping the actions of that employee and their associates. CPS employees learn through repetative hearings and peer review what works and what doesn't. The parents have no chance of a favorable result in that hearing. The actions of the CPS are not on trial, the alleged actions of the parents are. Whether the actions of the CPS are legitimate are not on the table. Only that CPS alleges the parents may have misperformed are presented, the only "safe" course for the judge to take is to rubber stamp the CPS allegations.

There is no chance a judge will deny a CPS request to retain possession of a child they have taken from their parents. The initial hearing is a pure rubber stamp operation. The parents will not prevail. Kangaroo Court is an apt description. No one can show a single inital hearing where the parents prevailed. The parents have no viable chance to present any contrary testimony at the initial hearing. CPS has a canned speech to give, the parents are blitzed by CPS having taken their children often with police assistance. The hearing must be held within 3 days because of its supposed importance in protecting the childs and parents rights. But, how important, is it really, to have a rubber stamp hearing that only has one outcome? "I am the Judge, holding this hearing within 3 days to protect your rights, you lose." The parents usually have no familiarity with the process and little ability to consult or ability to hire an attorney in the 3 days. The State, through CPS testimony, and a local tax paid prosecutor run through the script and the Judge rubber stamps the kidnapping. The scripted scene never varries. The court transcripts could as well be produced on a copy machine.

The initial hearings are a sham, a rubber stamp action. They are mandated in law to maintain a facade of "due process" but in fact only make the juridical system an accomplice and conspirator in State sanctioned kidnapping. There is no bona fide due process. Truly a Kangaroo could sit as Judge, and the results would not vary.

A 2 day hearing for over 400 children of ages from 1 to 17 of both boys and girls, with no actual individual presentation, a rubber stamp result, on the premise that a 1 year old girl may be forced to be married in 12 years, or a 3 year old boy may grow up to be a 50 year old man and then take a 13 year old "bride", is hardly "due process". It is State sanctioned Kidnapping.

If there are pregnant or even "married" 13, 14, or 15 year old girls in the group, then the State should see that those children are given help and protection while any adult men involved are prosecuted with real due process. However the State of Texas and the Texas CPS itself is an abuser of the remainder of the kidnapped children. A "shoot first and sort out the bodies later" process is not due course or protection of individual rights or child protection. It is child abuse in itself.

The press has reported that a Psychologist testified at the 2 day hearing that placing the children in the San Angelo Coliseum was harmful to the children. Therefore, the CPS has taken actions that are harmful to the children. The CPS has stated that they are going to separate the mothers of even 1-5 year old children from their children. Why? Is there any allegation of child brides of the ages of 1-5? What is the CPS going to do with the children? Spread them all over the state?

First it was "Take the children from the ranch, but the mothers could go with them". Then is "Take the children from the mothers, but those with children under 5 could stay with their children". Now it is "Take all the children from all the mothers, except those mothers under 16 can remain with their children." Why? Why? Why? Why can't a 17, 18 or 19 or for that matter 23 year old mother remain with her children? Does the State CPS assert that a 14 or 15 year old mother is more important to her baby's welfare than a 17, 18, or 19 year old mother? Or is it just a CPS divide and conquer technique to destroy the family relationships of mothers and children, destroy this very fundamentalist and offbeat religion and enhance its own importance and employee status at enormous cost?

We have been told the Nazis were conqured and squelched forever, but now the Texas CPS came for the FLDS, and in the name of "safety", they take their children. A rubber stamp judge approves the CPS actions. Can you see a difference between Nazi Germany circa 1938 and Texas 2007? Did the Nazi's put children and families in "camps", Does the Texas CPS? Do state troopers and police stand between mothers and children? Does anyone hear faint strains of the Nazi anthem playing in the backround? Listen closely.

In this CPS - FLDS matter, support can be given to underage brides and mothers, punishment can be given to illegal or abusive fathers, but the CPS has no business or right breaking up families based on what they think a parent might advocate for their child or all children in 10-15 years. That is a matter of Freedom of Speech and Freedom of Religion.

The Texas CPS is the current child abuser and Judge Walther is not protecting 400 plus children. As most other judges do, she is rubber stamping CPS abuse of children.

Charge the criminals, protect the young girls, but don't destroy families, a religion (even if some demonize it as a "cult"). Roman Catholics, Amish, Church of Christ, Branch Dividians, Mormons, Wiccans and a 100 or more other religions are sometimes called "cults".

Oh, and the TV and newspaper hubbub about Polygamy? America practices polygamy on a universal scale. It is called serial polygamy... marriage, divorce, remarriage, divorce, remarriage, divorce, remarriage, divorce, remarriage, divorce, remarriage. Six husbands, six wives? No problem.

Forget the TV headlines and particulary the TV lynchstress Nancy Grance. (Nancy, when will you apologize to the Marine wife who has now been found not guilty, because her husband was really not murdered with arsenic. (Try Never, unless she can use it to boost ratings or try to restore her tarnished image.)

==================================================

05/31/08

OK, the Court of Appeals has told Judge Walthers she is wrong. The Texas Supreme Court has told her she is wrong. She can't assist the Texas CPS in stealing 430 children. Even the never say die CPS is willing to return all but 5 of the children after the higher courts said CPS is wrong. But not... ta da... Judge Walther. This is a perfect example of the fact that the parents never got a fair hearing to begin with. The judge wants it her way, no matter what CPS and the parents have agreed to, and no matter what the Texas Court of Appeals and Supreme Court has ruled.

Abused children should be protected, and abusers should be punished, but there are not 420 or more currently abused children. The higher level courts have ruled that. Maybe there are 5. Judge Walther just can't give up gracefully and wait for evidence against the perpertrators. Texas CPS and the parents reached an agreement, but that didn't satisfy Judge Walther. She wants the all the parents photographed, and bound to not travel more than 60 miles from home. Gee whiz, Judge Air Head, this is Texas. There is only one half way major town within 60 miles of their home, San Angelo. CPS can spray the kids all over Texas, seperate parents and children and brothers and sisters, but the parents and children can only go to San Angelo? What is wrong with Austin, Odessa, San Antonio, Midland, or Abilene? The CPS raid and taking of 420 children, not to mention the "kidnapping of about 15 adults" was ILLEGAL as ruled by your two superior courts. Who made you Queen or God? Release the parents and children. Judge fairly any charges brought before you. Hopefully you will be disqualified from hearing any charges due to clear bias.

This pompous, self rightous, "I am the law, and above the law" air headed judge should be impeached, and if that doesn't happen, should be voted out of office at the next election. (Yes, in Texas Judges are elected, and can be unelected just as easily.)

Thought for the day:

You can lead a judge to facts, but you can't make her think.

First They Came for the Jews